Category : Content

Interest in GPON and VDSL2 vectoring and gigabit fiber to the home (FTTH) in North America pushed worldwide sales of broadband aggregation equipment to $2.1 billion in the second quarter of 2014, according to Infonetics Research. The market research firm reports in its upcoming 2Q14 “PON, FTTH, and DSL Aggregation Equipment and Subscribers” report due August 29 that broadband aggregation equipment sales grew 17% sequentially and 19% year-over-year.

The rising tight floated all technology boats versus 1Q14, Infonetics says. Point-to-point Ethernet FTTH equipment sales jumped 45%, DSL aggregation gear revenues climbed 21%, and PON systems sales increased 15%. Within the PON segment, GPON sales grew 19% sequentially in 2Q14 and 44% from the year-ago quarter, sparked by the Chinese market.

VDSL port deployments grew to 6.6 million in 2Q14, thanks to interest in the Europe/Middle East/Africa market – and particularly in Europe – in vectoring deployments. Meanwhile, the North American market overcame its traditional first quarter doldrums to rebound in the second quarter. The onset of U.S. projects that will leverage dollars from the Connect America Fund is expected to boost the overall North American market later in the year.

Infonetics’ quarterly broadband aggregation report tallies worldwide and regional market size, market share, forecasts through 2018, analysis, and trends for EPON, GPON, FTTH, FTTB, PON, and DSL aggregation equipment and subscribers.

Currently operators in countries around the world are investing heavily in rolling out fiber broadband to subscribers, either directly with Fiber to the Home (FTTH) or through halfway houses such as Fiber to the Cabinet (FTTC), as in the UK. This is increasing subscriber speeds, with the US average connection speed hitting 10.5 Mbps in Q1 2014, according to research from Akamai. Globally, the average speed is 3.9 Mbps, with South Korea heading the table with 23.6 Mbps.

The broadband world in 2020

A recent study has found that by 2020, consumers and businesses will be demanding even faster download and upload speeds. The research, carried out by the Technical University of Eindhoven and Dialogic, predicts a need for 165 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload speeds in less than six years time. This is modelled on three main factors:

The growth in take up of existing services (such as music downloads and conversational applications, such as Skype)

Greater bandwidth needs for higher quality downloads (such as the advent of Ultra HD video, streamed across the Internet)

Future uses that have yet to be introduced; six years is a long time in the life of the Internet – bear in mind that YouTube only began in 2005, for example.

Is FTTC enough?

So, how can operators meet this need?

In the UK, BT is rolling out a national FTTC network, combining fiber with existing copper connections for the last drop, while Virgin Media's cable network is already FTTC-based. Other operators such as CityFibre and Hyperoptic are deploying FTTH within cities such as London, York, Peterborough, Cardiff and Newcastle.

Obviously a completely new FTTH network is more expensive than upgrading existing connections to FTTC. And, at the moment, FTTC can deliver the capacity that most consumers require, with download speeds of up to 80 Mbps with VDSL2 technology – although this can vary depending on the distance from the cabinet.

But can FTTC meet the needs of future consumers, given the predictions of demand from the University of Eindhoven report?

The short answer is not with current technology. However there is a lot of research work going on to increase FTTC capacity, with standards such as G.Fast (which promises to deliver speeds of 200 to 500 Mbps) being trialled in the lab. Whether this performance translates to the real world is yet to be seen, particularly as high speeds are only achievable over relatively short distances.

In contrast, FTTH networks obviously have the capacity to carry this growth in traffic now, providing comparatively unlimited bandwidth that scales for the future. In the US, Far East and other parts of Europe, more and more FTTH networks are being deployed, creating gigabit cities where everyone has access to high speed broadband, with a huge impact on the economy, public services and the daily lives of citizens. The risk is that many places in the UK will slip behind international competitors if they don’t have the networks in place to underpin growth.

See the complete text in 

http://blog.m2fx.com/is-fttc-enough-for-the-uk%E2%80%99s-future-superfast-broadband-needs?utm_campaign=Joe%27s%20posts&utm_content=7557855&utm_medium=social&utm_source=linkedin

This summer AT&T says it will begin lighting up Dallas, Fort Worth, and surrounding Texas cities with U-verse with AT&T GigaPower, its symmetrical 1-Gbps fiber to the home (FTTH) service.

Dallas and Fort Worth were on AT&T’s list of 100 potential new markets for the GigaPower service announced in April this year.

In the Dallas area, the initial AT&T GigaPower network deployment will launch in Highland Park and University Park and offer the 1-Gbps service immediately. Other parts of Dallas and surrounding cities will launch this summer at up to 100 Mbps, and customers will be eligible to upgrade to speeds of up to 1 Gbps by the end of 2014. Surrounding cities launching at the lower rate will include Allen, Fairview, Irving, and McKinney.

In Fort Worth, initial deployment will launch at up to 100 Mbps as well, and customers also will be eligible to upgrade to speeds of up to 1 Gbps by the end of 2014, AT&T says. Additional cities around Fort Worth where up to 100 Mbps will also launch this summer include Arlington, Euless, Granbury, North Richland Hills, Weatherford, and Willow Park.

And this is only the beginning, the operator asserts. AT&T will continue lighting up new areas and expanding the AT&T GigaPower network to more residents and small businesses across North Texas through the end of 2014 and beyond.

“We’re proud to be the first to offer ultra high-speeds to local consumers and employers in Dallas, Fort Worth, and surrounding cities,” said Dave Nichols, president, AT&T Texas. “As we roll out these ultra-fast speeds beginning this summer, the AT&T GigaPower network will help encourage economic development in the area by facilitating a new wave of innovation through enhanced opportunities for education, health, research, and small business growth.”

“North Texas has a long history as a technology innovator,” said Mabrie Jackson, CEO/president of the North Texas Commission. “Maintaining that pace-setting role requires a continual nurturing of our tech ecosystem. AT&T’s substantial infrastructure investments in our region will help strengthen that competitive edge, ensuring that North Texas continues to lead in creating an environment that inspires technological innovation.”

AT&T notes that it has invested more than $6.55 billion in its Texas wireless and wireline networks from 2011 through 2013, and employs more than 35,500 people across the state.

The AT&T GigaPower network launched to thousands of households in Austin, Texas, and surrounding communities in December 2013. The AT&T GigaPower network will also expand to parts of North Carolina.

AT&T asserts that, if and when its proposed acquisition of DIRECTV is complete, the company will expand AT&T GigaPower to an additional 2 million customer locations. These 2 million locations for GigaPower will be over and above what the company has announced previously, AT&T says.

Worldwide shipments of broadband customer premises equipment (CPE) surpassed 146 million in 2013, according to the latest data from ABI Research. Net additions to the number of broadband subscribers as well as upgrades for existing customers will continue to drive the shipment of broadband CPE devices, which will reach 154.8 million units in 2019, the market research firm says.

Increasing fiber-optic broadband adoption is a key driver for the increase in device shipments; fiber-optic CPE represents 26% of total shipments in 2013, ABI Research found. As broadband operators extend their fiber-optic networks, increasing numbers of subscribers are switching from DSL-based broadband service to fiber-optic services. As a result, DSL broadband CPE shipments dropped over 6% in 2013.

“In many countries, DSL operators are committed to upgrade an existing network with advanced technology such as VDSL2 vectoring in order to provide higher speeds. Technology upgrade is expected to drive DSL broadband CPE shipments in the years to come,” said Jake Saunders, vice president and practice director.

Cable broadband CPE shipments grew around 2% over the year to reach 55 million units in 2013. As cable operators push DOCSIS 3.0 deployment, cable broadband CPE supporting the DOCSIS 3.0 standard has gained market share.

“Nearly two-thirds of cable CPE shipped in 2013 was DOCSIS 3.0 standard devices. ABI Research expects that DOCSIS 3.0 CPE will account for over 84% of cable broadband CPE shipments in 2014,”; said Khin Sandi Lynn, industry analyst.

ZTE Corp. (H: 0763.HK / A: 000063.SZ) remains top in overall broadband CPE market share in 2013, followed by Arris Group Inc. and Huawei Technologies Co Ltd. in second and third positions, respectively. Huawei and ZTE are also the leading vendors of fiber-optic CPE, and their combined shipments represent around 75% of total fiber-optic CPE shipments in 2013, ABI Research found.

ABI Research’s “Broadband CPE” market data covers worldwide shipments of CPE for wired broadband (DSL, cable, and fiber). The report tracks equipment by product type including modems, routers, gateways, and optical network terminals (ONTs).

Fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) deployment is increasing globally, led by the Asia Pacific region, rapid acceptance in Europe, and continuing rollouts in North America. Providers are feeling the pressure like never before to take fiber ever closer to residential and small-business locations. FTTH has emerged as the best option for offering both higher speeds and longer reach — not to mention peace of mind about future network requirements.

But network architects must make dozens of decisions before they break ground on new deployments and network upgrades to FTTH. These decisions involve splitter locations, connectorization methods, future upgradability, long-term maintenance, and cost (first cost, total cost, operating cost, etc.). Making the right choices is critical to ensure the new infrastructure design aligns as closely as possible with business expectations now and throughout the life of the network.

Although some parameters may overlap during the network planning process, important areas that ultimately drive architecture decisions include geographical location, business case, pre-deployment considerations, and futureproofing. Understanding any unique challenges posed within each of these areas — such as population densities, required take rates, advantages and disadvantages of connectorization options, or ease of migration to next generation technologies — will help service providers choose an optimal FTTH architecture.

Once the service provider is clear on where the network is going and what it needs to do, an informed architecture decision is possible. There are many architectures to choose from — centralized using closures or a fiber distribution hub, cascaded with or without closures, fiber indexing model, fiber reuse model, and any number of hybrid approaches. The correct option might be any one of these architectures or a combination of several. Weighing the benefits, drawbacks, and tradeoffs associated with each FTTH architecture will put service providers on the path to a proper balance of capital and operational cost, time, flexibility, reconfigurability, and overall performance.

Geographical, customer landscape

One obvious consideration is the geographical area the network will serve, particularly for a new deployment. Will the network primarily serve business customers, multidwelling units (MDUs), or single-family homes? Taking fiber to a rural area versus a densely populated environment will present different architectural challenges. Expected take rates must also be factored into the density equation, including any expected future development to the area.

The bandwidth requirements will also vary. In a situation that has both residential and business customers, for example, requirements may vary greatly in terms of availability and peak usage periods. Existing service-level agreements must also be honored for large businesses and institutions like hospitals, schools, government entities, or other large-scale users. Dark fiber applications such as fixed wireless, wireless LAN or WiMax, mobile networks, and key security monitoring devices may be required to serve all the customer needs in one area. The FTTH network may need to connect to some or all of these types of applications.

The physical environment should also be considered for the outside plant portion of the network. For example, in an area where outside temperatures vary considerably, the use of hardened connectors or other hardened products may be required to provide protection from harsh weather. Is the area prone to flooding, high wind, or other climatic events that may require everything to be in the ground or high above the ground?

In the case of a brownfield or overbuild scenario, much of this customer landscape information will already be available. But in these cases, a re-evaluation with an eye to the future will still help determine the type of architecture upgrade thatwill meet both current and future FTTH network requirements.

Meeting business-case expectations

The business case is where the balance between capital expenditures (capex) and operational expenditures (opex) is determined to reach the desired return on investment (ROI). In general, the infrastructure layer of the network has a useful life in the 10–20-year range. Spending more on capex typically reduces opex over time. But there are important issues that determine the overall cost, including speed of installation, ROI expectations, ease of maintenance and, in the case of overbuilds, any reuse of existing infrastructure.

A decision to spend less on capex to achieve a faster ROI, for instance, may be a good decision if the network's life expectancy is relatively short or if it will likely require major changes in the near future. On the other hand, when longevity of the network is a primary concern, spending more on capex may yield a longer ROI but save significant opex over time. In either case, this decision will have a major impact on the architecture choice.

There are also many factors that will influence how quickly the network can be deployed or how long an overbuild or upgrade will take to complete. For example, a completely connectorized network will be in place much faster than an all-spliced network due to the latter's specialized labor requirements and the time required for each splice. This decision also should factor in the availability of skilled labor — not just in the area of splicing but in general. The speed and scale of broadband growth is putting a strain on the availability of skilled and qualified workers to install networks and turn up services.

Another factor to consider is securing rights-of-way for placing cables or enclosures. As previously mentioned, some areas may need everything underground, including terminals and other enclosures, while some situations may call for aerial cables. Aesthetics are a huge concern in new developments and many MDUs and should not be ignored.

Finally, it's important to ascertain what, if any, current infrastructure can be reused in an upgrade or overbuild. If some fiber already exists, will it meet all the current requirements (e.g., low water peak, bend insensitivity)? Will any current active equipment still be usable or will it need replacing?

Deployment considerations

As service providers get closer to making an architectural choice, it's time to consider issues likely to be encountered during the actual deployment. For instance, if the network deployment is on a short timeline, then it may be beneficial to put emphasis on time saving methods such as a connectorized architecture that requires less skilled labor. But if time isn't a pressing concern, then acquiring the skilled technicians to splice the network together or using a combination of splices and connectors may provide more benefits. The level of capex must also be considered in the splicing versus connectors choice.

Where is the labor coming from? Some service providers may have their own labor while others rely solely on contractors. Again, that makes a difference in cost and skilled labor is not always readily available. However, trained labor remains an important requirement, particularly for ensuring proper installation and handling of optical fiber. Even with more resilient and robust reduced bend radius varieties, optical fiber is still glass and requires proper care.

Once the decisions regarding labor are made, picking a vendor partner for the project is another important step. Since FTTH is a relatively new venture for some service providers and municipalities, researching the experience and technology of different vendors of active and passive equipment could make the difference in meeting business-case goals.

Every FTTH deployment plan should consider the ease of migrating to the next generation of technologies. Passive-optical-network (PON) technology must be upgradable to whatever is expected to emerge as the next generation, such as NGPON or WDM PON (see Figure 3). The network should also be easily accessible for implementing these upgrades as well as future maintenance, changes, and reconfigurations.

In the case of brownfield or overbuilding existing infrastructures where there are already active customers, what effect will the project have on current services? Taking customers out of service is undesirable for any service provider and could result in losing customers to competitors. Therefore, an approach that minimizes or eliminates possible outages is highly advantageous.

Ready to choose

Once the "what, where, why, and who" questions have been addressed, it's time to get down to the "how" regarding which type of architecture will deliver on the expectations for the FTTH deployment. Since each deployment has its own set of challenges, expectations, and unique circumstances, a "one size fits all" architecture is impractical.

Thus, there is an array of architectural options that provide benefits under the right set of conditions. The optimal architecture for the service provider will always be the one that's most cost-effective, flexible, and scalable while adapting to the unique challenges of a particular deployment scenario.

ERIK GRONVALL is a business development manager at TE Connectivity

Ireland’s private telecom operator enet plans to bring high speed fiber optic broadband services to Claremorris. The initial target would be business customers in Claremorris. The Chamber of commerce encouraged potential fiber optic broadband subscribers to sign up for the service.

The fiber broadband network would be a reality if more than 50% of the businesses in Claremorris show their interest by signing up for the service. The deployment would be feasible if enet gets enough subscribers from local businesses. If this happen Claremorris would be the first town in Ireland to get a full coverage by fiber optic networks to the premises. The network topology under consideration is Fiber to the business (FTTB), but the reports say the fiber optic network may terminate at a cabinet near customer premise in which case it would be Fiber to the cabinet.

FTTH Council defines FTTB as Fiber to the building and Fiber to the business. In case of Fiber to the building, the fiber optic cables go inside the building basement and get terminated at the Fiber distribution hub. From fiber distribution hub, legacy copper cables would be used to give connectivity with the end user. FTTH council ranks nations based on the statistics of percentage of houses and businesses connected with FTTH/FTTB, fiber LAN networks. Fiber to the business is about giving last mile optical fiber connectivity to the business units.

In any country, business subscribers or the enterprise customers are the creamy layer that the service providers are eager to give connectivity. For business customers, fiber optic broadband opens a new world of opportunities. Those who are familiar with the possibilities of internet, social media and web applications realize the importance of high speed broadband services and know clearly the reasons why we need fiber optic cables at the last mile.

Claremorris is an Irish town in County Mayo. It is one of the fastest growing cities in Ireland. Though low lying, the city has no threat from flood and hence fiber optic infrastructures even if they are underground are safer from flood related damages.

enet is the private telecom operator in Ireland providing open access networks that are carrier neutral. They operates and managed fiber optic networks known as MANs or Metropolitan Area Networks. The company provides bandwidth to licensed operators such as BT, Imagine, Vodafone and UPC. More than 100 local enterprises attended the information seminar and they were urged to sign up through Chamber of commerce. Fiber optic network construction will create new jobs in the local market. The planned broadband speed of 250 Mbps will give the users a totally a different internet experience. The promoter of the fiber optic broadband to Claremorris, enet is confident of proceeding with the project by seeing the positive response at the time of seminar.